Out of the three great plays of Shakespeare: "Romeo and Juliet,""Macbeth,"and "King Lear," "King Lear" was the most complicated one. While reading "King Lear,' I had a hard time connecting and remembering all of the characters. I've figured out that the play is a tangle of two familes with two different stories-King Lear and Gloucester.
Personally, I think that King Lear is a pitiful and obtuse father. Why had he given land to his three daughters as if he was playing a game? It is like saying, "The one who describes to me how much they love me the best will receive the most land." It is just ridiculous.
Gloucester's son Edmund is a complete evil "genuis." Edmund had plotted against his brother Edgar and his father, which had led to a whole heap of trouble (Gloucester's eyes even get taken out!). I think it was outrageous that Gloucester had believed Edmund without thinking twice and had fallen into the trap. At the end, I think it was too nice of Edgar to forgive his father Gloucester.
I certainly believe that "King Lear" was very well-writtened, though its stories were all very pitiful. Shakespeare was definitely a genius. His plots were all very carefully thought and planned out. His plays are complicating, but marvelous with intricate details.
